Preview
Filing # 207076583 E-Filed 09/17/2024 02:27:38 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11" JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN AND FOR MIAMI DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION JORGE L CAO GARCIA AND MAYLEN MACHADO TORRES, Plaintiffs, CASE NUMBER: vs. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiffs, JORGE L CAO GARCIA AND MAYLEN MACHADO TORRES, by and through the undersigned counsel sue Defendant, CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION, and allege: GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 1 This is an action for damages that is in excess of $50,000.00, exclusive of attorney’s fees, costs, and interest. 2. Plaintiffs are sui juris and residents of the state of Florida. 3 Defendant is a Florida insurance company authorized to do and actually conducting insurance business in Miami Dade County, Florida. 4 Defendant issued to Plaintiffs, an insurance policy (Policy No.: 04557263-3; Claim No.: 001-00-472647) affording residential property and casualty insurance coverage for the property located at 2905 Southwest 108th Place Miami, FL 33165. A copy of the policy is under “EXHIBIT A”.5 Plaintiffs paid the premium charged by the Defendant for the coverages affordedpursuant to the terms of the policy, and the policy was in full force and effect on the date of loss. 6 On or about July 19", 2023, damage as a result of a windstorm, which causedsubstantial property damage and further insured losses. 7 Damage as a result of a windstorm is a covered cause of loss pursuant to the termsand conditions of the insurance policy issued by Defendant. 8 Plaintiffs submitted a timely claim to the Defendant for the damages and has metall conditions precedent to the filing of a lawsuit. 9. A Notice of Intent to Initiate Litigation was sent to the Defendant on behalf of thePlaintiffs supported by an estimate of the damages prepared by a licensed and insured generalcontractor. 10. Defendant has failed to tender any insurance proceeds by denying the claim fordamages. COUNT I- BREACH OF CONTRACT ll. Plaintiffs adopt and incorporate into this Count the allegations set forth inparagraphs | through 10. 12. Defendant has breached its insurance contract with the Plaintiffs, by denying theclaim for damages, failing to acknowledge coverage for all damages caused by and reasonablerepairs associated with the loss, and failing and refusing to tender all insurance proceeds due andowing for the losses sustained as a result of the loss. 13. As a result of the Defendant ’s breach of contract, Plaintiffs have been deprived ofthe coverages and other benefits afforded under the insurance policy.14. As a further result of the Defendants breach of contract, Plaintiffs have been forcedto retain the services of an attorney and are obligated to pay reasonable attorneys’ fees and coststo prosecute this action. Plaintiffs are entitled to recover these attorneys’ fees and costs from theDefendant pursuant to §627.428, Fla. Stat. 15. Also, as a result Defendants breach of contract, Plaintiffs have been forced to incuradditional fees, costs, and expenses to pursue their insurance claim, all of which were reasonablyforeseeable by the Defendant at the time of contracting. 16. Plaintiffs have complied with all conditions required to be performed by theDefendant and/or have been excused from performance of any conditions by the conduct of, and/orthe conditions have otherwise been waived. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, JORGE L CAO GARCIA AND MAYLEN MACHADOTORRES, demand judgment against Defendant, CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCECORPORATION, for actual interest, costs, attorneys’ fees and any other relief this Court deemsjust and appropriate. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiffs demand a trial by jury of all issues that are triable as a matter of right. Kandell, Kandell & Petrie Attorneys for Plaintiff Suite 500 / Grand Bay Plaza 2665 S. Bayshore Drive Miami, Florida 33133 Tel: (305) 858-2220 - By: 4/, IZABELLA MOJICA, Esq. Florida Bar No.: 1049083 Imojica@kkpfirm.com pleadings@kkpfirm.com Igroup@kkpfirm.comCITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION2101 MARYLAND CIRCLE CnzensTALLAHASSEE, FL 32303TELEPHONE: (888) 685-1555. PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION AFFIDAVIT OF CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS (Florida Evidence Code §§ 90.803(6) and 90.902(11), Fla. Stat.) I, Taleah Robinson, am the Records Assistant for Citizens Property Insurance Corporation (Citizens) and in such capacity I have the authority to certify the attached records. Attached hereto is a copy of Citizens’ Policy No. 04557263 of Policyholder Jorge Cao Garcia. This policy was kept by Citizens in the regular course of business, and it was the regular practice of Citizens for an employee or representative with knowledge of the act recorded to make the record or transmit information thereof to be included in such record. This record was made at or near the time of the act. The records attached hereto are exact duplicates of the original. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit and that the facts stated in it are true. Digitally signed by Taleah Taleah Robinson Date: 2024.09.10 Robinson 13:51:27 -04'00' September 10, 2024 Date Taleah Robinson Records Assistant Citizens Property Insurance Corporation Carlos Beruff, Chairman, Manatee County e Josh Becksmith, St. Johns County e Jason Butts, Pinellas County LeAnna Cumber, Duval County e Jillian Hasner, Palm Beach County e Erin Knight, Miami-Dade County Charlie Lydecker, Volusia County @ Nelson Telemaco, Broward County @ M. Scott Thomas, St. Johns County Tim Cerio, President/CEO and Executive DirectorCITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION 301 W BAY STREET, SUITE 1300 JACKSONVILLE FL 32202-5142Conzens PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION. Homeowners HO-3 Special Form Policy - DeclarationsPOLICY NUMBER: 04557263 - 3 POLICY PERIOD: FROM 11/18/2022 To 11/18/2023 at 12:01 a.m. Eastern Time at the Location of the Residence PremisesTransaction: AMENDED DECLARATIONS Effective: 11/18/2022Named Insured and Mailing Address: Location Of Residence Premises: Agent: FI. Agent Lic. #: W173621First Named Insured: 2905 SW 108TH PL SADE'S INSURANCE CORPJorge Cao Garcia MIAMI FL 33165-2463 JORGE SADE2905 SW 108TH PL County:MIAMI-DADE 8839 SW 40TH STMIAMI, FL 33165-2463 MIAMI, FL 33165Phone Number: 786-955-7704 Phone Number: 305-501-5005 Citizens Agency ID#: 31362Primary Email Address:jorgecao84@gmail.comAdditional Named Insured: Please refer to “ADDITIONAL NAMED INSURED(S)” section for detailsCoverage is only provided where a premium and a limit of liability is shownAll Other Perils Deductible: $2,500 Hurricane Deductible: $6,324 (2%) LIMIT OF LIABILITY ANNUAL PREMIUMSECTION I - PROPERTY COVERAGES $4,579 A. Dwelling : $316,200 B. Other Structures: $0 C. Personal Property: $0 D. Loss of Use: $31,620SECTION II - LIABILITY COVERAGES E. Personal Liability: $100,000 $15 F. Medical Payments: $2,000 INCLUDEDOTHER COVERAGES Ordinance or Law Limit (25% of Cov A) (See Policy) Included SUBTOTAL: $4,594Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund Build-Up Premium: $84Premium Adjustment Due To Allowable Rate Change: $0MANDATORY ADDITIONAL CHARGES: 2022 Florida Insurance Guaranty Association (FIGA) Regular Assessment $33 2022-B Florida Insurance Guaranty Association (FIGA) Regular Assessment $61 Emergency Management Preparedness and Assistance Trust Fund (EMPA) $2 Tax-Exempt Surcharge $82TOTAL POLICY PREMIUM INCLUDING ASSESSMENTS AND ALL SURCHARGES: $4,856The portion of your premium for:Hurricane Coverage is $1,993 Non-Hurricane Coverage is $2,685Authorized By: JORGE SADE Processed Date: 11/07/2022DEC HO3 12 19 First Named Insured Page 1 of 4CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION 301 W BAY STREET, SUITE 1300 JACKSONVILLE FL 32202-5142Conzens PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION. Homeowners HO-3 Special Form Policy - DeclarationsPolicy Number: 04557263 - 3 POLICY PERIOD: FROM 11/18/2022, TO 11/18/2023First Named Insured: Jorge Cao Garcia at 12:01 a.m. Eastern Time at the Location of the Residence PremisesForms and Endorsements applicable to this policy:CIT HO-3 02 22, CIT 04 96 02 16, CIT 04 86 02 21, CIT HO 01 09 06 22, CIT 23 70 07 08, CIT 04 85 02 21, IL P 001 01 04, CIT 27 0613, CIT 04 12 02 16, CIT 24 07 08 Rating/Underwriting InformationYear Built: 1979 Protective Device - Burglar Alarm: NoTown / Row House: No Prote e Device - Fire Alarm: NoConstruction Type: Masonry Protective Device - Sprinkler: NoneBCEGS: Ungraded No Prior Insurance Surcharge: NoTerritory / Coastal Territory: 034 / 00 Terrain: CcWind / Hail Exclusion: No Roof Cover: FBC EquivalentMunicipal Code - Police: 999 Roof Cover - FBC Wind Speed: N/AMunicipal Code - Fire: 999 Roof Cover - FBC Wind Design: N/AOccupancy: Owner Occupied Roof Deck Attachment: Level CUse: Primary Roof-Wall Connection: Single WrapsNumber of Families: Secondary Water Resistance: UnknownProtection Class: Roof Shape: GableDistance to Hydrant (ft.): 500 Opening Protection: Class ADistance to Fire Station (mi.):A premium adjustment of ($2,141) is included to reflect the building's wind loss mitigation features or construction techniques that exists.A premium adjustment of $0 is included to reflect the building code effectiveness grade for your area. Adjustments range from a 2%surcharge to a 13% credit.The Total Charge For This Endorsement is $0 ADDITIONAL NAMED INSURED(S)Name AddressNo Additional Named Insureds DITIONAL INTEREST(S) # Interest Type Name and Address Loan Number PENNYMAC LOAN SERVICES LLC ISAOA 1 1st Mortgagee 8193312927 PO BOX 6618 SPRINGFIELD, OH 45501-6618DEC HO3 12 19 First Named Insured Page 2 of 4CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION 301 W BAY STREET, SUITE 1300or IZENS JACKSONVILLE FL 32202-5142 Homeowners HO-3 Special Form Policy - DeclarationsPolicy Number: 04557263 - 3 POLICY PERIOD: FROM 11/18/2022 TO 11/18/2023First Named Insured: Jorge Cao Garcia at 12:01 a.m. Eastern Time at the Location of the Residence Premises FLOOD COVERAGE IS NOT PROVIDED BY THIS POLICY. THIS POLICY CONTAINS A SEPARATE DEDUCTIBLE FOR HURRICANE LOSSES, WHICH MAY RESULT IN HIGH OUT-OF-POCKET EXPENSES TO YOU. YOUR POLICY PROVIDES COVERAGE FORA CATASTROPHIC GROUND COVER COLLAPSE THAT RESULTS IN THE PROPERTY BEING CONDEMNED AND UNINHABITABLE. OTHERWISE, YOUR POLICY DOES NOT PROVIDE COVERAGE FOR SINKHOLE LOSSES. YOU MAY PURCHASE ADDITIONAL COVERAGE FOR SINKHOLE LOSSES FOR AN ADDITIONAL PREMIUM. LAW AND ORDINANCE: LAW AND ORDINANCE COVERAGE IS AN IMPORTANT COVERAGE THAT YOU MAY WISH TO PURCHASE. PLEASE DISCUSS WITH YOUR INSURANCE AGENT.DEC HO3 12 19 First Named Insured Page 3 of 4CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION 301 W BAY STREET, SUITE 1300 JACKSONVILLE FL 32202-5142Conzens PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION. Homeowners HO-3 Special Form Policy - DeclarationsPolicy Number: 04557263 - 3 POLICY PERIOD: FROM 11/18/2022, TO 11/18/2023First Named Insured: Jorge Cao Garcia at 12:01 a.m. Eastern Time at the Location of the Residence Premises FLOOD INSURANCE: YOU MAY ALSO NEED TO CONSIDER THE PURCHASE OF FLOOD INSURANCE. YOUR HOMEOWNER'S INSURANCE POLICY DOES NOT INCLUDE COVERAGE FOR DAMAGE RESULTING FROM FLOOD EVEN IF HURRICANE WINDS AND RAIN CAUSED THE FLOOD TO OCCUR. WITHOUT SEPARATE FLOOD INSURANCE COVERAGE, YOU MAY HAVE UNCOVERED LOSSES CAUSED BY FLOOD. PLEASE DISCUSS THE NEED TO PURCHASE SEPARATE FLOOD INSURANCE COVERAGE WITH YOUR INSURANCE AGENT.TO REPORT ALOSS OR CLAIM CALL 866.411.2742IN CASE OF LOSS TO COVERED PROPERTY, YOU MUST TAKE REASONABLE EMERGENCY MEASURES SOLELY TO PROTECTTHE PROPERTY FROM FURTHER DAMAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.PROMPT NOTICE OF THE LOSS MUST BE GIVEN TO US OR YOUR INSURANCE AGENT. EXCEPT FOR REASONABLEEMERGENCY MEASURES, THERE IS NO COVERAGE FOR REPAIRS THAT BEGIN BEFORE THE EARLIER OF: (A) 72 HOURSAFTER WE ARE NOTIFIED OF THE LOSS, (B) THE TIME OF LOSS INSPECTION BY US, OR (C) THE TIME OF OTHER APPROVALBY USTHIS POLICY CONTAINS LIMITS ON CERTAIN COVERED LOSSES, ALL SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF YOURPOLICY. THESE LIMITS MAY INCLUDE A $10,000 LIMIT ON COVERAGE FOR COVERED LOSSES CAUSED BY ACCIDENTALDISCHARGE OR OVERFLOW OF WATER OR STEAM FROM SPECIFIED HOUSEHOLD SYSTEMS, SEEPAGE OR LEAKAGE OFWATER OR STEAM, CONDENSATION, MOISTURE OR VAPOR, AS DESCRIBED AND INSURED IN YOUR POLICY (HEREAFTERCOLLECTIVELY REFERRED TO AS ACCIDENTAL DISCHARGE OF WATER IN THIS PARAGRAPH). AS ANOTHER EXAMPLE, THEREIS ALSO LIMIT OF $3,000 APPLICABLE TO REASONABLE EMERGENCY MEASURES TAKEN TO PROTECT COVERED PROPERTYFROM FURTHER DAMAGE BY ACCIDENTAL DISCHARGE OF WATER. THE AMOUNT WE PAY FOR THE NECESSARY REASONABLEEMERGENCY MEASURES YOU TAKE SOLELY TO PROTECT COVERED PROPERTY FROM FURTHER DAMAGE BY ACCIDENTALDISCHARGE OF WATER WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE $10,000 LIMIT ON COVERAGE FOR ACCIDENTAL DISCHARGE OFWATER.INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR POLICY MAY BE MADE AVAILABLE TO INSURANCE COMPANIES AND/OR AGENTS TO ASSISTTHEM IN FINDING OTHER AVAILABLE INSURANCE MARKETS.PLEASE CONTACT YOUR AGENT IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PERTAINING TO YOUR POLICY. IF YOU ARE UNABLE TOCONTACT YOUR AGENT, YOU MAY REACH CITIZENS AT 866.411.2742.DEC HO3 12 19 First Named Insured Page 4 of 4HOMEOWNERS CIT 04 12 02 16 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. EXCLUSION OF COVERAGE B - OTHER STRUCTURES FOR USE IN CITIZENS FORM CIT HO-3 And CIT HO-8SECTION | - PROPERTY COVERAGESB. COVERAGE B - OTHER STRUCTURES Coverage B - OTHER STRUCTURES in your policy is deleted. Coverage B is excluded from your Policy. We do not cover loss or damage to other structures on the "residence premises" set apart from the dwelling by clear space. This includes structures connected to the dwelling by only a fence, utility line, or similar connection.All other provisions of this Policy apply.CIT 04 12 02 16 Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., Page 1 of 1 with its permissionHOMEOWNERS CIT 04 85 02 21 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. TO REPORT ALOSS OR CLAIM CALL 866.411.2742 EMERGENCY WATER REMOVAL SERVICESAt our option, we may offer you the Program described in this “Endorsement”. If the offer is made by us, with yourconsent a “Contractor(s)” that is participating in the Program will contact you. The “Contractor” will provide necessaryreasonable emergency water removal services, as described below, solely to protect your covered propertyunder Coverage A, Coverage B and Coverage C from further damage.Your Policy has specific requirements about notifying us in the event of direct physical loss or damage to property,which are found in SECTION I -CONDITIONS, Condition B. Duties After Loss.Should you have concerns regarding your “Contractor” at any time during the process of emergency water removalprovided under this “Endorsement”, you may directly contact your Citizens’ claim representative at the telephonenumber provided to you, or call our toll free Call-Center at 866.411.2742 and a representative will be available todiscuss your concerns.CONSENT 2. The services provided under this “Endorsement”At our option and with your consent to participate in the do not include any replacement, repair or theservices provided under this “Endorsement”, the rebuilding of the dwelling or other structures andfollowing provisions of the Policy are either added or do not include any replacement, repair or theamended. rebuilding of the dwelling or other structures necessary to perform the emergency waterYour consent provided on or after reporting a claim of extraction and drying services.loss or damage and the provisions of this “Endorsement”are only for that reported claim of loss or damage. When such replacement, repair or the rebuilding is necessary, all other provisions of your PolicyThe provisions of this “Endorsement” do not apply to any apply.subsequent claim of loss or damage, unless we opt toparticipate in the services provided under this SECTION I — CONDITIONS, Condition I. Our“Endorsement” and you provide another consent as Option in CIT HO-3 does not apply to the servicesdescribed above. we or the “Contractor” provide under this “Endorsement”.AGREEMENT Your deductible does not apply to the servicesThe following is added: provided under this “Endorsement”.In the event of a direct physical loss to property covered Any payment for emergency water removalunder Coverage A, Coverage B or Coverage C located services provided under this “Endorsement” willon the "residence premises" caused by accidental not be deducted from the $3,000 limit underdischarge or overflow of water or steam from within a SECTION I - PROPERTY COVERAGES F.1.plumbing, heating, air conditioning or automatic fire Reasonable Emergency Measures and will not beprotective sprinkler system or household appliance, a deducted from the $10,000 limit on coverageparticipating “Contractor” will be in contact with you to under SECTION I — PERILS INSURED AGAINSTprovide only necessary reasonable emergency water A. Coverage A - Dwelling And Coverage B —extraction and drying services solely to protect property Other Structures paragraphs A.3. and A.6., in CITfrom further damage, as provided under this HO-3.“Endorsement”.The following applies:1. The services provided under this “Endorsement” are limited to only necessary reasonable emergency water extraction and drying services made solely to protect property from further damage.CIT 04 85 02 21 Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., Page 1 of 3 with its permissionAll other covered emergency water removal SECTION | — CONDITIONS services not provided under this “Endorsement”, Condition B. Duties After Loss after application of any applicable deductible, will be included in and limited to the $3,000 limit under The following paragraphs are added to Condition B. Section I - PROPERTY COVERAGES F.1. Duties After Loss in CIT HO-3: Reasonable Emergency Measures which will be Your duties under Condition B. Duties After Loss deducted from the $10,000 limit on coverage in CIT HO-3 apply, whether under this provided in paragraphs A.3. and A.6. under “Endorsement” you or your representative: SECTION I — PERILS INSURED AGAINST A. 1. Prevent the “Contractor” from providing or Coverage A - Dwelling And Coverage B — Other completing the services, or Structures. 2. Have another party perform or contract to This “Endorsement” does not increase any limit of perform a duty on your behalf. liability applicable to the damaged covered The services provided under this “Endorsement” property. are not a loss inspection. All conditions stipulated We will make payment directly to the “Contractor” as in SECTION I— CONDITIONS, Condition B. Duties described in SECTION I - CONDITIONS, Condition After Loss, paragraph B.1. in CIT HO-3 apply. J. Loss Payment of this “Endorsement” for services Our option and your consent to participate in the the “Contractor” provides under this “Endorsement”. services provided under this “Endorsement” are Any services provided under this “Endorsement” material parts of this “Endorsement”. Under no for loss or damage that is not covered under your circumstances does this “Endorsement” relieve you Policy does not cause or create coverage. or us of any duties and obligations under the Policy not specifically amended, added or deleted in this In consenting to participate in the services provided “Endorsement”. under this “Endorsement”, you acknowledge that Citizens is not a party to the contract between you Condition J. Loss Payment and the Program “Contractor”. Regarding the services performed under this “Endorsement”, Condition J. Loss Payment paragraphs 1., 2. and 3. are deleted in CIT HO-3 and replaced withDEFINITIONS paragraph 1. in J. below:The following definition is added: J. Loss PaymentThe term “Endorsement” shall mean “form CIT 04 85” 1. We will pay the “Contractor” directly.and shall mean “form CIT 04 85” in the paragraph(s)added or replaced in CIT HO-3 under this“Endorsement”. SECTION | AND II - CONDITIONSThe following definition is added regarding the services Condition I. Notification Regarding Accessprovided by the “Contractor” under this “Endorsement” The following is added to Condition I. Notification“Contractor” means a person, entity or company, Regarding Access in CIT HO-3 as regards thisincluding their employees, agents, representatives “Endorsement”.and general or specialty contractors who is a member Our offer and your consent to participate in theof the network engaged by Citizens to provide the EMERGENCY WATER REMOVAL SERVICESservices under this “Endorsement”. “Endorsement” requires agreement to a mutual schedule with you, and your permission for the “Contractor” to enter the “Residence Premises” at the address designated in your Declarations as the Location of Residence Premises, for the purpose of inspecting your loss and providing the services under this “Endorsement”. If there is no permission or agreement, this “Endorsement” does not apply and all other provisions of your policy apply.Page 2 of 3 Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., CIT 04 85 02 21 with its permissionTERMINATION OF CONSENT1. Your consent to participate in this “Endorsement” is terminated if you or your representative: a Notify us or the “Contractor” to stop providing the services or you or your representative prevent the “Contractor” from providing or completing the emergency water removal services under this “Endorsement”. Fail to sign or execute any contract(s) or authorization(s) provided by the “Contractor” for emergency water removal services. Upon termination of your consent, this “Endorsement” no longer applies, and instead all other provisions of your Policy apply. Additionally, the following also applies: a All duties required under SECTION I - CONDITIONS, Condition B. Duties After Loss in CIT HO-3 will apply, which may include water removal if needed. However, we will make payment directly to the “Contractor” as described in SECTION I - CONDITIONS, Condition J. Loss Payment in of this “Endorsement” for any services the “Contractor” provides under this “Endorsement”. The deductible described under SECTION I — CONDITIONS, Condition R. Deductible in CIT HO-3 will apply, except we will not apply a deductible to any part of our loss settlement with you that represents the payment we make to the “Contractor” for the services the “Contractor” provides under this “Endorsement”.POLICY PROVISIONSThe following are added: This “Endorsement” does not cover any services you or your representative obtain from other providers or contractors. Instead all other provisions of your Policy apply regarding the services you or your representative obtain from other service providers or contractors.CIT 04 85 02 21 Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., Page 3 of 3 with its permissionHOMEOWNERS CIT 04 86 02 21 THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. TO REPORT ALOSS OR CLAIM CALL 866.411.2742 MANAGED REPAIR CONTRACTOR NETWORK PROGRAMAt our option, we may offer you the Program described in this “Endorsement”. If the offer is made by us, a “Contractor”that is participating in the Program will contact you. We or the “Contractor(s)” will provide a scope of repairsfor covered damages to your dwelling and other structures, covered under Coverage A or B, for damage or lossfrom a covered peril described in your Policy. To participate in the Program and accept our offer, you must signand return the Program Consent Form provided by us. As a Program participant, you will directly contract with the“Contractor” to make the repairs of covered damages provided in the scope you received.Your Policy has specific requirements about notifying us, in the event of direct physical loss or damage to property,which are found in SECTION I — CONDITIONS, Condition B. Duties After Loss.Should you have concerns regarding your “Contractor” at any time during the repair, replacement or rebuildingprocess provided under this “Endorsement”, you may directly contact your Citizens’ claim representative at thetelephone number provided to you, or call our toll free Call-Center at 866.411.2742 and a representative will beavailable to discuss your concerns.CONSENT . If the $10,000 limit on coverage under SECTIONYou must provide written consent to participate in this I— PERILS INSURED AGAINST A. Coverage A -Program. Dwelling And Coverage B — Other StructuresYour written consent to participate in this Program can paragraphs A.3. and A.6. in CIT HO-3 is applicable to the covered loss, the $10,000 limitonly be provided to us by completing and returning to us, on coverage does not apply while you areon or after reporting a claim of loss or damage, the participating in the Program.Program Consent Form provided to you by Citizens. However, if your participation in the Program isThe provisions of this “Endorsement” are only for thatreported claim of loss or damage. The provisions of this terminated under 1. or 2. above or terminated as“Endorsement” do not apply to any subsequent claim of described elsewhere in this “Endorsement” and theloss or damage, unless we exercise our option to utilize $10,000 limit on coverage is applicable to the covered loss, the $10,000 limit on coverage applies.the Program and you provide another written consent ina Program Consent Form provided by Citizens. You are not eligible to participate in the Program if:PROGRAM PARTICIPATION a You incur any costs for repairs or you start any repairs, replacement or rebuilding of property1. Your participation in the Program as described in covered under Coverage A or B, prior to our this Endorsement and your Policy is contingent receipt of your written consent to participate in upon the property, prior to or at the time of the the Program and the execution of the contract loss, being in a condition that does not impair or between you and the “Contractor”; or prevent the Program be” ability to “Contractor’s You request participation in the Program after repair the covered loss. you have incurred any costs for repairs or you Your participation in the Program is terminated if have started any repairs, replacement or we or the Program “Contractor” determine: rebuilding of property described under a. Conditions are present that prevent repair, Coverage A or B. replacement or rebuilding of the property from In this event, the most we will pay is the applicable starting or being completed; or limit of liability or if applicable the $10,000 limit on The property is in a condition that impairs or coverage, as described and provided in your ba” prevents the Program “Contractor’s” ability to Policy. repair the covered loss.CIT 04 86 02 21 Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., Page 1 of 5 with its permissionAGREEMENT 3. Until you provide written consent to participate inThe following, subject to the PROGRAM the Program and execute the contract with thePARTICIPATION provisions of this “Endorsement”, are “Contractor”, the $10,000 limit on coverage underadded: SECTION I — PERILS INSURED AGAINST A. Coverage A - Dwelling And Coverage B — Other . In the event of a direct physical loss to property Structures paragraphs A.3. and A.6. in CIT HO-3 covered under Coverage A or Coverage B under will apply if the covered loss results from a this “Endorsement”: covered peril described in paragraph A.2.b.(6) in a We or the “Contractor” will provide you a scope CIT HO-3 under Section | — Perils Insured of repairs for covered damages. Against, A. Coverage A — Dwelling And Coverage b As necessary, we will provide you a revised B — Other Structures. scope(s) of repairs for covered damages a. Payment for Reasonable Emergency describing any additional covered loss or Measures under SECTION I Property - damages discovered during the repair, Coverages paragraph F.1., which occurs in the replacement or rebuilding of property covered same loss will be deducted from the $10,000 under Coverage A or Coverage B that are not limit on coverage. included in the original scope of repairs for b. The $10,000 limit on coverage applies if: covered damages. (1) You do not provide written consent to Together, these scopes under a. and b. above participate in the Program; are your scope of repairs for covered damages to property covered under Coverage A or (2) Your participation in the Program has been terminated by you or us; or Coverage B. To participate in the Program and accept our offer, (3) You make a subsequent request to participate in the Program for the same loss you must sign and return the Program Consent Form and your request is not accepted by us. provided by us and directly enter into a contract with the Program’s “Contractor” to repair, replace 4 Any payment made by us to you for a loss, less or rebuild the damaged property included in the any payment made by us to you under SECTION scope of repairs for covered damages. | - PROPERTY COVERAGES F. Reasonable Emergency Measures for that loss, must be a The contract between you and the “Contractor” returned to us if for the same loss if: will be for the repairs, replacement or rebuilding of the damaged property covered a. The Program is re-offered to you and you under Coverage A or Coverage B included in consent to participate in the Program; or the scope of repairs for covered damages. We b. A subsequent request by you to participate in are not a party to the contract between you and the Program is accepted by us. the “Contractor” and the “Contractor” is not an 5. If a contract has been executed between you and agent of Citizens. the “Contractor” as described in the Payment for the repairs, replacement or “Endorsement”, you will be responsible for rebuilding of the damaged property in the payment to the “Contractor” of the deductible contract described in paragraph 2.a. above will described in SECTION I - CONDITIONS, be paid directly to the “Contractor” as Condition R. Deductible in CIT HO-3. described inSECTION | — CONDITIONS, We will pay the “Contractor” directly as described Condition J Loss Payment of this in SECTION I — CONDITIONS, Condition J. Loss “Endorsement”, less any applicable Payment of this “Endorsement”, less the deductible. deductible you are responsible for in 5. above, for the amount, if any, owed the “Contractor” for their performance of repairs, replacement or rebuilding of covered property covered under Coverages A or B indicated in the scope of repairs for covered damages. In no event will you be responsible for paying more than one deductible in any one loss.Page 2 of 5 Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc., CIT 04 86 02 21 with its permission. If the covered loss results from a covered peril TERMINATION OF CONSENT other than the peril described in paragraph 1 If you have provided written consent in a Program A
Related Contentin Miami-Dade County
Case
EASTERN EXPRESS INC vs Guillermo Lopez Lara et al
Sep 12, 2024 |CA25 - Downtown Miami - Judge Manno-Schurr, Valerie |Contract & Indebtedness |Contract & Indebtedness |2024-017455-CA-01
Case
Sep 09, 2024 |CA11 - Downtown Miami - Judge Eig, Spencer |Contract & Indebtedness |Contract & Indebtedness |2024-017098-CA-01
Case
FELIX SALVADOR ACOSTA ET AL VS CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
Sep 10, 2024 |CA15 - Downtown Miami - Judge Rodriguez, Jose M |Contract & Indebtedness |Contract & Indebtedness |2024-017206-CA-01
Case
OLIVA'S HOME CORP VS ILDAR VENTURES LLC
Sep 09, 2024 |CA25 - Downtown Miami - Judge Manno-Schurr, Valerie |Contract & Indebtedness |Contract & Indebtedness |2024-017090-CA-01
Case
ECAPITAL FREIGHT FACTORING CORP. vs QWN Express, LLC et al
Sep 12, 2024 |CA06 - Downtown Miami - Judge Johnson, Charles |Contract & Indebtedness |Contract & Indebtedness |2024-017481-CA-01
Case
MARCOS GARCIA vs UNIVERSAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Sep 13, 2024 |CA13 - Downtown Miami - Judge Brinkley, Tanya |Contract & Indebtedness |Contract & Indebtedness |2024-017509-CA-01
Case
ALEXIS CABALLERO RODRIGUEZ et al vs CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
Sep 13, 2024 |CA22 - Downtown Miami - Judge Butchko, Beatrice A |Contract & Indebtedness |Contract & Indebtedness |2024-017558-CA-01
Case
Sep 12, 2024 |CA10 - Downtown Miami - Judge Lopez, Peter R |Contract & Indebtedness |Contract & Indebtedness |2024-017405-CA-01
Case
Anderson Joar Ordonez Oviedo vs Guy Lichtenstein et al
Sep 11, 2024 |CA09 - Downtown Miami - Judge Echarte Jr, Pedro P |Contract & Indebtedness |Contract & Indebtedness |2024-017273-CA-01
Ruling
COACHELLA VALLEY COLLECTION SERVICE vs MORALES
Sep 11, 2024 |CVPS2305479
COACHELLA VALLEY Motion to Amend Judgment byCVPS2305479 COLLECTION SERVICE vs COACHELLA VALLEY COLLECTIONMORALES SERVICETentative Ruling: The unopposed motion of Plaintiff, Coachella Valley Collection Service, to CorrectClerical Error on Judgment is GRANTED. The judgment related to personal debt is changed to$4,378.97.
Ruling
Plaza Services, LLC vs Kimeca Johnson
Sep 10, 2024 |23CV-02167
23CV-02167 Plaza Services LLC v. Kimeca JohnsonMotion to Set Aside Default Judgement and Quash Service of SummonsThe unopposed Motion to Set Aside Default Judgement and Quash Service of Summonsis GRANTED. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF MERCED Civil Unlawful Detainers Hon. Jennifer O. Trimble Courtroom 12 1159 G Street, Los Banos Tuesday, September 10, 2024 2:00 p.m. The following tentative rulings shall become the ruling of the court unless a party gives notice of intention to appear as follows: 1. You must call (209) 725-4111 to notify the court of your intent to appear. 2. You must give notice to all other parties before 4:00 p.m. of your intent to appear. Per California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1), failure to do both items 1 and 2 will result in no oral argument. Note: Notifying Court Call (the court’s telephonic appearance provider) of your intent to appear does not satisfy the requirement of notifying the court. IMPORTANT: Court Reporters will NOT be provided; parties wanting a hearing transcript must make their own arrangements.Case No. Title / DescriptionThere are no Unlawful Detainer Matters Scheduled
Ruling
Autovest LLC vs Alvaro Escalera
Sep 11, 2024 |24CV-00016
24CV-00016 Autovest LLC v. Alvaro EscaleraCourt TrialAppearance required. Parties who wish to appear remotely must contact the clerk of thecourt at (209) 725-4111 to seek permission and arrange for a remote appearance.
Ruling
ROSS PRODUCTION SERVICES VS TRILLER ACQUISITION LLC, A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Sep 10, 2024 |23SMCV04532
Case Number: 23SMCV04532 Hearing Date: September 10, 2024 Dept: M CASE NAME: Ross Production Services v. Triller Acquisition LLC, et al. CASE NO.: 23SMCV04532 MOTION: Motion to Vacate Default, Default Judgment HEARING DATE: 9/10/2024 Legal Standard Relief under Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) section 473(b) is either discretionary or mandatory. A motion for mandatory relief must be made no more than six months after entry of judgment and be accompanied by an attorneys sworn affidavit attesting to the attorneys mistake, inadvertence, surprise or neglect. (CCP § 473(b).) The attorney affidavit of fault must contain a straight forward admission of fault. (State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Pietak (2001) 90 Cal.App.4th 600, 610.) But it need not contain an explanation of the reasons for the attorneys mistake, inadvertence surprise or neglect. (Martin Potts & Assocs., Inc. v. Corsair, LLC (2016) 244 Cal.App.4th 432, 438-441.) Relief must be granted unless the court finds that the default or dismissal was not in fact caused by the attorney's mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect. (Ibid.) If mandatory relief is granted, the court must direct the attorney to pay reasonable compensatory legal fees and costs to the opposing counsel or parties. (CCP § 473(b).) Where a party cannot obtain an attorney affidavit of fault, the party may seek discretionary relief under section 473(b) due to mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. (CCP § 473(b).) A motion for discretionary relief must be made within a reasonable time but in no instance exceeding six months after the judgment, dismissal, order, or proceeding was taken. (Id.) If discretionary relief is granted, the court may in its discretion order the moving party to pay the costs, including attorney fees, incurred in obtaining the default. (Rogalski v. Nabers Cadillac (1992) 11 Cal.App.4th 816, 823; Vanderkous v. Conley (2010) 188 Cal.App.4th 111, 118-119.) If the motion for discretionary relief is granted, the court may order the offending attorney to pay monetary sanctions up to $1,000 to opposing parties, or up to $1,000 to the State Bar Client Security Fund, or [g]rant other relief as is appropriate. (CCP § 473(c)(1)(A), (B), (C).) A motion for relief under section 473(b) shall be accompanied by a copy of the answer or other pleading proposed to be filed therein, otherwise the application shall not be granted. . . (CCP § 473(b).) However, this requirement is not jurisdictional; substantial compliance may suffice. (Carmel, Ltd. v. Tavoussi (2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 393, 403 [finding substantial compliance where counsel offered proposed answer at motion hearing rather than serving it with moving papers].) CCP section 473.5(a) permits the court to set aside a default or default judgment [w]hen service of a summons has not resulted in actual notice to a party in time to defend the action and a default or default judgment has been entered against him.¿ The notice of motion shall be served and filed within a reasonable time, but in no event exceeding the earlier of:¿ (i) two years after entry of a default judgment against him or her; or (ii) 180 days after service on him or her of a written notice that the default or default judgment has been entered .¿ (Id.) The phrase actual notice means genuine knowledge of the party litigant and does not include constructive or imputed notice to the client.¿ (Tunis v. Barrow (1986) 184 Cal. App. 3d 1069, 1077.) A defendant also must show that his lack of actual notice in time to defend the action was not caused by his inexcusable neglect or avoidance of service.¿ (Id. at 1077-1078.) Further, the court is not required to accept [a] self-serving evidence contradicting the process server's declaration. (Rodriguez v. Nam Min Cho (2015) 236 Cal.App.4th 742, 751.) Analysis Defendant Triller Hold Co. LLC (sued as Triller Acquisition LLC) (hereinafter, THC) moves for an order setting aside the default and default judgment entered against Defendant Triller Acquisition LLC, a Limited Liability Company DBA Triller Fight Club ((hereinafter, TA). On September 25, 2023, Plaintiff commenced this action against TA. TAs default (the Default) was requested and entered on November 14, 2023 (the day after the responsive pleading deadline) and a default judgment (the Default Judgment) was entered against TA on December 18, 2023. Defendant demonstrates that the service of Complaint and Summons did not put it on actual notice in time to defend the action prior to default. Defendant explains that the named defendant, TA, merged into THC on August 17, 2022. (Lee Decl., Ex. A.) Paracorp Incorporated (Paracorp) was TAs Registered Agent for Service of Process. (Lee Decl., ¶ 7.) Paracorp was also the Registered Agent for Service of Process for Triller and many other Triller-affiliated entities. (Lee Decl., ¶ 7.) The founder and former manager of TA had designated himself as the designated service recipient (DSR) with Paracorp, such that service earmarked for TA went to him. (Lee Decl., ¶ 8.) Following the Merger, THC filed the Certificate of Merger with Paracorp. (Lee Decl., ¶ 10.) Therefore, Triller was under the impression that it would from that point on be the DSR for anything served on the now-defunct TA. (Lee Decl., ¶ 10.) According to the proof of service on file, Plaintiff served the summons on TA via Paracorp on October 11, 2023. Unbeknownst to Triller, Paracorp had not in fact updated its DSR for TA. (Lee Decl., ¶ 10.) The former DSR ended up receiving notice of the suit, and because he no longer had any incentive to defend the action, he did not promptly notify anyone at Triller of the suit. (Lee Decl., ¶ 8.) Triller did not learn of this lawsuit until January 26, 2024. Triller obtained a copy of the default judgment on January 31, 2024. (¶ 9.) Upon inquiry, Trilled learned that the DSR for TA had not actually been updated. (Lee Decl., ¶ 10.) Paracorp provided the Complaint as well as documents related to the Default and Default Judgment. (Lee Decl., ¶ 11.) Triller promptly noticed their appearance on January 31, 2024. (Woodland Decl., ¶ 3, Ex. A.) Defendant shows their good faith and reasonable efforts to resolve the default without resorting to a motion. (See Lee Decl., ¶12; Woodland Decl., ¶ 4, Ex. B.) These efforts explain any delay between Defendants discovery of this action at the end of January and its filing of this motion on May 14, 2024. Thus, Defendant demonstrates that the motion was timely made, and that its lack of actual notice in time to defend the action was not caused by its avoidance of service or inexcusable neglect required for relief under section 473.5. Defendant also shows a mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect, such that discretionary relief under section 473(b) is appropriate. Plaintiff filed a perfunctory opposition, suggesting that service was enough to put Defendant on notice, but not materially disputing Defendants explanation. Accordingly, Defendants motion to vacate default and default judgment is GRANTED. Defendants proposed answer is filed as of this date.
Ruling
ON DECK CAPITAL, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION VS WELLBEING FOOD, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, ET AL.
Sep 11, 2024 |11/28/2022 |21SMCV00400
Case Number: 21SMCV00400 Hearing Date: September 11, 2024 Dept: N TENTATIVE RULING GRANT [X] Compensatory:$62,244.90 [X] Costs: $ 1,312.80 [X] Attorney fees: $ 2,134.90 GRANTED in the total sum of $65,692.60
Ruling
FORWARDLINE FINANCIAL, LLC., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS DRAGAN PEROVIC, AN INDIVIDUAL
Sep 16, 2024 |23SMCV05874
Case Number: 23SMCV05874 Hearing Date: September 16, 2024 Dept: 205 HEARING DATE: September 16, 2024 JUDGE/DEPT: Moreton/Beverly Hills, 205 CASE NAME: Forwardline Financial, LLC v. Dragan Perovic CASE NUMBER: 23SMCV05874 COMP. FILED: December 18, 2023 PROCEEDINGS: REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOVING PARTY: Forwardline Financial, LLC RESPONDING PARTY: Dragan Perovic BACKGROUND This is a breach of contract case. PD Freight LLC (Borrower) applied for a loan from Plaintiff Forwardline Financial, LLC, pursuant to a Loan and Security Agreement (the Agreement). Defendant Dragan Perovic executed a personal guarantee whereby, if PD Freight, LLC defaulted on the loan, he would be personally liable to Plaintiff. Borrower defaulted on the loan, owing $29,921.58. On December 18, 2023, Plaintiff filed a complaint alleging claims for breach of contract, account stated and open book account. The Complaint seeks damages in the amount of $29,921.58, plus interest at the rate of 10% per annum, attorneys fees and costs. Plaintiff served Defendant by substitute service on February 13, 2024. Defendant was obligated to respond within 30 days. Defendant did not do so. Plaintiff successfully requested the entry of Defendants default, which was entered by the Clerks Office on April 10, 2024. Plaintiff requested a default judgment on June 4, 2024. Plaintiff served Defendant by mail with both the Request for Entry of Default and Request for Default Judgment. Defendant has not appeared. RELIEF REQUESTED Default judgment against Defendant for a total of $37,005.66, which is comprised of: (1) $29,921.58, for damages, (2) $5,394.08 in interest, (3) $1,200 in attorneys fees and (4) $490, for costs. ANALYSIS Code Civ. Proc. § 585 sets forth the two options for obtaining a default judgment. First, where the plaintiffs complaint seeks compensatory damages only, in a sum certain which is readily ascertainable from the allegations of the complaint or statement of damages, the clerk may enter the default judgment for that amount. However, if the relief requested in the complaint is more complicated, consisting of either nonmonetary relief, or monetary relief in amounts which require either an accounting, additional evidence, or the exercise of judgment to ascertain, the plaintiff must request entry of judgment by the court. In such cases, the plaintiff must affirmatively establish his entitlement to the specific judgment requested. (Kim v. Westmoore Partners, Inc. (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 267, 287.) Section 585 also allows for interest, costs and attorney fees, where otherwise allowed by law. (Code Civ. Proc. § 585(a).) Multiple specific documents are required, such as: (1) form CIV 100, (2) a brief summary of the case; (3) declarations or other admissible evidence in support of the judgment requested; (4) interest computations as necessary; (5) a memorandum of costs and disbursements; (6) a proposed form of judgment; (7) a dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment under Code Civ. Proc. § 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment; (8) exhibits as necessary; and (9) a request for attorneys fees if allowed by statute or by the agreement of the parties. (CRC Rule 3.1800.) Here, Plaintiff has properly complied with all the substantive and procedural requirements for a default judgment. Substantively, Plaintiff declares via declaration that there have been damages in the amount of $29,291.58 as amounts owing under the loan and guaranty. A memorandum of costs in the amount of $490 is set forth in Item 10 of the CIV-100 form. The evidence submitted (the Agreement, the Guaranty and the Statement of Account) is authenticated by further declaration. Plaintiff seeks $1,200 in attorneys fees, which is authorized under Civ. Code § 1717.5 and also supported by declaration. Plaintiff seeks $5,394.08 in interest, from the default date of June 22, 2022 through and including April 10, 2024, which calculation is supported by declaration. Procedurally, Plaintiff properly served Defendant more than 30 days prior to requesting entry of default and default judgment, correctly completed JC Form CIV-100 in a manner that would not void or put at issue the entry of default, provided a declaration of non-military status, requested damages in amounts supported by the filings and not in excess of the amount stated in the Complaint, requested dismissal of doe defendants and filed a proposed judgment (JUD-100). As default has already been entered and there has been no appearance or filing whatsoever from Defendant, default judgment is appropriate here. CONCLUSION AND ORDER For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff Forwardline Financial, LLCs Request for Default Judgment is GRANTED as to Defendant Dragan Perovic. Judgment in the amount of $37,005.66 is awarded in favor of Plaintiff.
Ruling
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. vs RULM, AN INDIVIDUAL
Sep 11, 2024 |CVPS2400364
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. vs Motion to Vacate Judgment and DismissCVPS2400364RULM, AN INDIVIDUAL Case by WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.Tentative Ruling: The motion of Plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., to Vacate Judgment againstDefendant Alaam Rulm is GRANTED. The Clerk’s Judgment of July 3, 2024 is vacated and the caseis dismissed without prejudice.
Ruling
Sep 09, 2024 |PSC1907647
KAJON MEDIA vs VACATIONPSC1907647 Motion to CompelPOOLS & SPAS INCKAJON MEDIA vs VACATIONPSC1907647 Motion to CompelPOOLS & SPAS INCKAJON MEDIA vs VACATIONPSC1907647 Motion to CompelPOOLS & SPAS INCMotion for Order to Deem MattersKAJON MEDIA vs VACATIONPSC1907647 Admitted first requests for admissions toPOOLS & SPAS INCKajon MediaTentative Ruling:On 10/22/19, Plaintiff Kajon Media filed a complaint against Defendant Vacation Pools & Spas,Inc. for: (1) open book account; (2) account stated; (3) reasonable value of services received; and(4) unjust enrichment for unpaid amounts totaling $39,723.On 3/23/23, Defendant filed a cross-complaint against Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant JonathanReiss (an alleged alter ego of Plaintiff) for: (1) breach of written contract; (2) breach of oralcontract; (3) common count—reasonable value of services and materials; (4) common count—open book account; (5) promissory fraud—oral agreement; (6) abuse of process; and (7)declaratory relief. Defendant alleges that on 9/5/20, it and Plaintiff entered into a settlementagreement where Defendant agreed to pay $7,500 to Plaintiff and provide construction servicesand materials to Reiss’s residence. Reiss was not satisfied, and Defendant agreed to provideadditional services. Defendant provided services and materials of at least $24,000, when it didnot know that Plaintiff had applied for a default judgment.Trial is currently set for 9/26/24.Defendant moves to compel initial responses to form and special interrogatories, and requestsfor production, and deem admissions, served 8/4/23. Plaintiff failed to serve any responses, andthen its counsel was relieved, which did not occur until months later. New counsel refused toengage in a meet and confer. It requests sanctions of $1,285 against Plaintiff and its counsel,per motion.Plaintiff contends the motions are moot since responses have been served. Counsel alsocontends that with a close trial date, he cannot prepare for trial without a continuance.Defendant contends that Plaintiff’s responses contained objections, and is a basis for sanctions.It argues that Plaintiff fails to demonstrate any basis for failure to provide discovery responses.AnalysisCCP §2030.290(b) and §2031.300(b) allow the propounding party to file a motion to compelresponses to interrogatories and document demands if a response has not been received. Ifresponses are untimely, responding party waives objections. (CCP §§ 2030.290(a),2031.300(a).) The trial court retains authority to compel responses irrespective of the lateresponses. (Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants (2007) 148Cal.App.4th 390, 405-407.)For the interrogatories and requests for production, the court finds that the responses areimproper. Plaintiff provided objections—despite waiving them and not seeking relief from waiver.For special interrogatories nos. 1, 3-5, 7-9, 12, Plaintiff only objected. For nos. 2, 6, 10-11, 13-14, Plaintiff referred to response no. 2, which is “none to Plaintiff’s knowledge.” This is not code-compliant and not responsive. The remaining are not responsive at all: nos. 15-18 (“do notunderstand the question”), and 19-29 (“provide a copy of the document being referred to so aproper, accurate response may be provided”—where the declaration was filed by Plaintiff.) Forform interrogatories, Plaintiff included objections in nos. 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 9.1, 9.2, 12.1, 12.4, 12.5,12.6, 12.7, 15.1, 17.1, 50.1, 50.2, 50.3, 50.4, 50.5, 50.6, and to the extent that Plaintiff included aresponse—they were not substantive and vague. For nos. 12.2, 12.3, 13.1 (“not to Plaintiff’sknowledge”), nos. 12.4 and 12.5 (“to be determined”), and no. 13.2 (“n/a”), Plaintiff provided non-responses. For all requests for production, Plaintiff included objections, stated that Defendantsalready have the documents and that discovery is continuing. This is non-responsive.Sanctions are appropriate. Defendant’s request of $1,285 ($350 x 3.5 + $60 filing fee) per motionis excessive. A more reasonable amount is $410 per motion ($350 x 1 hour + $60 filing fee).Accordingly, the Court orders Plaintiff to pay sanctions in the amount of $1,230 to Defendantforthwith.As for requests for admissions, failure to respond permits the propounding party to move for anorder deeming the admissions admitted. (CCP §2033.280.) The court shall grant the motion“unless it finds that the party to whom the requests for admission have been directed has served,before the hearing on the motion, a proposed response…in substantial compliance with Section2033.220.” (CCP §2033.280(c).) For requests for admission, they are taken in totality of theproposed response, rather than each individual response. (St. Mary v. Superior Court (2014) 223Cal.App.4th 762, 782.)Here, there is only one request for admission, which was to determine the genuineness of thedocument. Plaintiff objected and stated it is unable to determine from the photocopy attached.Again, Plaintiff waived the objection, and this is not a code-compliant response. A response musteither include an admission, denial, lack of knowledge or objection. (CCP §§2033.220 and2033.230.) If a party is unable to admit or deny, it shall state that a reasonable inquiry has beenmade. (CCP §2033.220(c).) For the latter, a “party has a duty to make a reasonable investigationof the facts before answering items which do not fall within his personal knowledge.” (Bloxhamv. Saldinger (2014) 228 Cal.App.4th 729, 751-752.) The reason is that “requests for admissionsare more closely akin to summary adjudication procedures than to orthodox discovery, beingdesigned not so much to ‘discover’ the facts and to expedite trial preparation as to render itunnecessary to try an otherwise triable issue of fact or law.” (St. Mary v. Superior Court (2014)223 Cal.App.4th 762.) The motion is granted.Sanctions are mandatory for requests for admissions. (CCP §2033.280(c).) Again, sanctions of$410 is ordered payable forthwith.Total sanctions for all four motions payable from Plaintiff to Defendant is $1,640 payable forthwith.
Document
JUDY NUNEZ VS CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
Sep 12, 2024 |CA23 - Downtown Miami - Judge Perkins, Joseph D |Contract & Indebtedness |Contract & Indebtedness |2024-017436-CA-01
Document
NEXT LEVEL USA, LLC VS MAXIM SEMYONOV ET AL
Apr 14, 2023 |Contract & Indebtedness |Contract & Indebtedness |2023-015305-CA-01
Document
BIANCA RUIZ CACERES VS CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBCRIBING
Sep 12, 2024 |CA22 - Downtown Miami - Judge Butchko, Beatrice A |Contract & Indebtedness |Contract & Indebtedness |2024-017411-CA-01
Document
RKR ZEUS, LLC VS PHILIPPE MIAMI, LLC ET AL
May 17, 2024 |CA44 - Downtown Miami - Judge Walsh, Lisa S |Contract & Indebtedness |Contract & Indebtedness |2024-009079-CA-01
Document
BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF MIAMI, INC. ET AL VS NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH PARTNERSHIP, INC. ET AL
Nov 27, 2018 |CA06 - Downtown Miami - Judge Johnson, Charles |Contract & Indebtedness |Contract & Indebtedness |2018-039575-CA-01
Document
Maria Cobas vs Citizens Property Insurance Corporation
Sep 10, 2024 |CA06 - Downtown Miami - Judge Johnson, Charles |Contract & Indebtedness |Contract & Indebtedness |2024-017202-CA-01
Document
BIANCA RUIZ CACERES VS CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBCRIBING
Sep 12, 2024 |CA22 - Downtown Miami - Judge Butchko, Beatrice A |Contract & Indebtedness |Contract & Indebtedness |2024-017411-CA-01
Document
KELBYS TERRON ET AL VS CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION
Sep 04, 2024 |CA06 - Downtown Miami - Judge Johnson, Charles |Contract & Indebtedness |Contract & Indebtedness |2024-016796-CA-01